ADVANCEMENTS IN ROBOTICS FOR PRECISION DENTAL IMPLANTOLOGY: OPPORTUNITIES EXPLORED, CHALLENGES IDENTIFIED
Abstract
Robotics in dental implantology represents a rapidly advancing field that combines precision engineering, artificial intelligence, and digital planning to improve surgical accuracy and patient outcomes. This review explores the evolution of robotic systems from passive and semi-active platforms to fully autonomous and AI-integrated technologies. Current applications, such as haptic guidance, computer-assisted navigation, and 3D-printed surgical guides, demonstrate significant benefits in reducing surgical errors, optimizing workflows, and enhancing predictability of implant placement. However, widespread adoption faces barriers including high costs, steep learning curves, limited accessibility for smaller practices, and technical limitations in challenging clinical scenarios. Emerging trends—such as micro–nano robotic systems, multifunctional platforms, and AI-driven decision support—highlight future opportunities to revolutionize implantology. To achieve broader clinical integration, further research must focus on cost-efficiency, simplification of workflows, validation of outcomes, and patient acceptance, ensuring that robotics becomes an essential tool in precision dentistry.
References
1. Dong, J. What you should know about the history of robotics. Robot Ind. 1, 108–114 (2015).
2. Almurib, H.A.; Al-Qrimli, H.F.; Kumar, N. A review of application industrial robotic design. In Proceedings of the 2011 Ninth International Conference on ICT and Knowledge Engineering, Bangkok, Thailand, 12–13 January 2012; pp. 105–112.
3. S.L. Bolding, U.N. Reebye Accuracy of haptic robotic guidance of dental implant surgery for completely edentulous arches J Prosthet Dent, 128 (2022), pp. 639-647
4. A review of robotics in dental implantology
5. Can computer-assisted implant surgery improve clinical outcomes and reduce the frequency and intensity of complications in implant dentistry? a critical review
6. Y. Wu, F. Wang, S. Fan, J.K.F. Chow Robotics in dental implantology Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin, 31 (2019), pp.
7. Advantages and disadvantages of implant navigation surgery. a systematic review
8 Yip, M. et al. Artificial intelligence meets medical robotics. Science 381, 141–146
9. Y. Wu, F. Wang, S. Fan, J.K.F. Chow Robotics in dental implantology Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin, 31 (2019), pp. 513-518
10 . Rawal, S.; Tillery, D.E., Jr.; Brewer, P. Robotic-Assisted Prosthetically Driven Planning and Immediate Placement of a Dental Implant. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent. 2020, 41, 26–30. [PubMed]
11.Yan, Y. Jia A review on human comfort factors, measurements, and improvements in human–robot collaboration Sensors, 22 (2022)
12. Z. Xu, Y. Xiao, L. Zhou, et al. Accuracy and efficiency of robotic dental implant surgery with different human-robot interactions: an in vitro study J Dent, 137 (2023)
13.Z. Xu, Y. Xiao, L. Zhou, et al. Accuracy and efficiency of robotic dental implant surgery with different human-robot interactions: an in vitro study J Dent, 137 (2023), Article 104642
14. S. Bai, N. Ren, Z. Feng, et al. Animal experiment on the accuracy of the autonomous dental implant robotic system Chin J Stomatol, 56 (2021), pp. 170-174
15 W. Wang, H. Xu, D. Mei, et al. Accuracy of the yakebot dental implant robotic system versus fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery template in edentulous jaw implantation: a preliminary clinical study Clin Implant Dent Relat Res (2023) (in press)
16. K. jie Cheng, T. shu Kan, Y. feng Liu, et al. Accuracy of dental implant surgery with robotic position feedback and registration algorithm: an in-vitro study Comput Biol Med, 129 (2021), Article 104153
17. Z.S. Haidar Autonomous robotics: a fresh era of implant dentistry… is a reality J Oral Res, 6 (2017), pp. 230-231
18. Y. Wu, F. Wang, S. Fan, J.K.F. Chow Robotics in dental implantology Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin, 31 (2019), pp. 513-518
19. Y. Yan, Y. Jia A review on human comfort factors, measurements, and improvements in human–robot collaboration
20. S. Yang, J. Chen, A. Li, P. Li, S. Xu Autonomous robotic surgery for immediately loaded implant-supported maxillary full-arch prosthesis: a case report J Clin Med, 11 (2022), p. 6594
21. C. Li, M. Wang, H. Deng, et al. Autonomous robotic surgery for zygomatic implant placement and immediately loaded implant-supported full-arch prosthesis: a preliminary research Int. J. Implant Dent., 9 (2023), p. 12
22. Block MS, Emery RW. Static or dynamic navigation for implant placement choosing the method of guidance. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74:269–77. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.09.022
23. Elian N, Jalbout ZN, Classi AJ, Wexler A, Sarment D, Tarnow DP. Precision of flapless implant placement using real-time surgical navigation: A case series. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:1123–7.
24. Somogyi-Ganss E, Holmes HI, Jokstad A. Accuracy of a novel prototype dynamic computer-assisted surgery system. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2015;26:882–90. doi: 10.1111/clr.12414.
25. Surgical Guides, Implant Planning & CT Segmentation | 3DDX [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 30]. Available from: https://www.3ddx.com/.
26. OnDemand3D [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 30]. Available from: https://dexis.com/en-au/ondemand3d.
27. Downloads [Internet]. Dental Wings. [cited 2023 May 30]. Available from: https://dentalwings.com/downloads/.
28. Carina. exocad DentalCAD [Internet]. exocad. [cited 2023 May 30]. Available from: https://exocad.com/our-products/exocad-dentalcad.
29. 3D implantology software | Planmeca Romexis [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 30]. Available from: https://www.planmeca.com/software/software-modules/planmeca-romexis-3d-implantology/.
30. Implant Studio-Guided Surgery & Dental Implant Planning Software [Internet]. 3Shape. [cited 2023 May 30]. Available from: https://www.3shape.com/en/software/implant-studio.
31. NobelClinicianTM Software | Inside Dentistry [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 30]. Available from: https://www.aegisdentalnetwork.com/id/products/nobel-biocare/nobelclinician-software.
32. coDiagnostiX® [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 30]. Available from: https://codiagnostix.com/.
33. Blue Sky Plan | dental treatment planning software | United States [Internet]. blueskyplan. [cited 2023 May 30]. Available from: https://www.blueskyplan.com.
34. Simplant Implant Planning Software | Dentsply Sirona USA [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 30]. Available from: https://www.dentsplysirona.com/en-us/discover/ discover-by-brand/simplant.html.
35. R2GATE [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 30]. Available from: https://r2gate.com/.
36. R. A. Kamal, M. L. Sanni, M. Y. Kanj (Saudi Arabian Oil Company), US Patent Application 20150285945, 2016.
37. Cai H, Liang X, Sun DY, Chen JY. Long term clinical performance of flapless implant surgery compared to the conventionalapproach with flap elevation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases. 2020; 8: 1087– 1103.
38. Kopp KC, Koslow AH, Abdo OS. Predictable implant placement with a diagnostic/surgical template and advanced radiographic imaging. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89: 611– 615.
39. De Vico G, Spinelli D, Bonino M, et al Computer-assisted virtual treatment planning combined with flapless surgery and immediate loading in the rehabilitation of partial edentulies. Oral Implantol (Rome). 2012; 5: 3– 10.
40. Lin CC, Wu CZ, Huang MS, Huang CF, Cheng HC, Wang DP. Fully digital workflow for planning static guided implant surgery: a prospective accuracy study. J Clin Med. 2020; 9: 980.
41. D'haese J, Velde TV, Komiyama AI, et al Accuracy and complications using computer-designed stereolithographic surgical guides for oral rehabilitation by means of dental implants: a review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012; 14: 321– 335.
42. Casseta M, Manbro DI, Stefanelli LV, et al How does an error in positioning the template affect the accuracy of implants inserted using a single fixed mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide? Int J Oral Maxilofac Surg. 2014; 43: 85– 92.
43. Ma L, Jiang W, Zhang B, et al Augmented reality surgical navigation with accurate CBCT-patient registration for dental implant placement. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2019; 57: 47– 57.
44. Testori T, Robiony M, Parenti A, et al Evaluation of accuracy and precision of a new guided surgery system: a multicenter clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014; 34 (Suppl 3): s59– s69.
45. Shi, B. & Huang, H. Computational technology for nasal cartilage-related clinical research and application. Int. J. Oral. Sci. 12, 21 (2020).
46.Testori T, Robiony M, Parenti A, et al Evaluation of accuracy and precision of a new guided surgery system: a multicenter clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014; 34 (Suppl 3): s59– s69.
47. Qiao, S. C., Wu, X. Y., Shi, J. Y., Tonetti, M. S. & Lai, H. C. Accuracy and safety of a haptic operated and machine vision controlled collaborative robot for dental implant placement: a translational study. Clin. Oral. Implant. Res. 34, 839–849 (2023).
48. Li Z. W. The study on accuracy of the Dental Implantology Robotic System. Air Force Medical University Vol. Graduate. (2021).
49. Ding, Y. et al. Accuracy of a novel semi-autonomous robotic-assisted surgery system for single implant placement: a case series. J. Dent. 139, 104766 (2023).
50. Shi, B. & Huang, H. Computational technology for nasal cartilage-related clinical research and application. Int. J. Oral. Sci. 12, 21 (2020).
51. Zhou, L., Teng, W., Li, X. & Su, Y. Accuracy of an optical robotic computer-aided implant system and the trueness of virtual techniques for measuring robot accuracy evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine in vitro. J. Prosthet. Dent. 11:S0022- 3913(23)00751-5. Epub ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.11.004 (2023).
52. S. Chen, Q. Ou, X. Lin, Y. Wang Comparison between a computer-aided surgical template and the free-hand method: a systematic review and meta-analysis Implant Dent, 28 (2019), pp. 578-589
53. N. Li, Z. Jiang, R. Pu, D. Zhu, G. Yang Implant failure and associated risk factors of transcrestal sinus floor elevation: a retrospective study Clinal Oral Implants Res, 34 (2023), pp. 66-77
54. M. Olivetto, J. Bettoni, S. Testelin, M. Lefranc Zygomatic implant placement using a robot-assisted flapless protocol: proof of concept Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 52 (2023), pp. 710-715
55. W. Zhang, H. Li, L. Cui, et al. Research progress and development trend of surgical robot and surgical instrument arm
56. "Transforming Prosthodontics and Oral Implantology Using Robotics and Artificial Intelligence" (Frontiers)
57 ."From Tradition to Technology: Robotic Artificial Intelligence in Dental Implantology" (Cureus)
58. "Robotics in Dentistry: A Narrative Review" (MDPI)
