BEYOND CHATBOTS: HOW SPECIALIZED AI TOOLS ARE REDUCING LEGAL WORKLOADS

Authors

  • Malika Khikmatillaeva Author

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has begun to transform legal practice, moving far beyond simple chatbot assistants. Law firms and legal departments are increasingly deploying specialized AI tools to automate routine and labor-intensive tasks, with the promise of significant efficiency gains. A recent industry survey found that nearly three-quarters of lawyers plan to integrate generative AI into their work within the next year[1]. These lawyers intend to use AI for tasks such as reviewing legal documents, sifting through electronic data, and drafting contracts[2]. This trend reflects growing confidence that AI can shoulder a substantial portion of legal workloads, allowing attorneys to focus on higher-level analytical and advisory work. At the same time, courts and professional bodies have cautioned that AI outputs must be treated with care – an attorney was famously sanctioned for submitting a brief with fictitious AI-generated citations[3]. The dual realities of AI’s potential and its pitfalls have set the stage for a new era in law: one where specialized AI tools perform heavy lifting in research, document analysis, and drafting, while human lawyers provide oversight and expertise.

 

[1] Stanford HAI & RegLab, AI on Trial: Legal Models Hallucinate in 1 out of 6 Benchmarking Queries, Stanford HAI Blog (May 23, 2024), https://hai.stanford.edu.

[2] L. Moran, 73% of Lawyers Plan to Use Generative AI, Legal Dive (Nov. 20, 2023), https://www.legaldive.com.

[3] Stanford HAI & RegLab, AI on Trial: Legal Models Hallucinate in 1 out of 6 Benchmarking Queries, Stanford HAI Blog (May 23, 2024), https://hai.stanford.edu.

References

A. Bryson, Barriers to Fairness in AI Legal Tools, 34 Harv. J.L. & Tech. (2021).

A. Schindler, Allen & Overy Deploys GPT-Based Legal App Harvey Firmwide, LawNext (Feb. 16, 2023), https://www.reuters.com.

ABA Ctr. for Prof’l Responsibility, Tech Competency Adoption by State (2023), https://www.americanbar.org.

ABA, Generative AI and Model Rules of Professional Conduct (2023).

Am. Bar Ass’n, Formal Op. 498 (2021).

Am. Bar Ass’n, Formal Op. 512 (2023).

Clio, 2023 Legal Trends Report, https://clio.com/resources/legal-trends.

Clio, AI in Law Firm Operations (2023).

D. Schwarcz et al., AI-Powered Lawyering, SSRN Working Paper No. 5162111 (Mar. 2025), https://eduers.ssrn.com.

D.M. Katz et al., Predicting the Behavior of the Supreme Court, 12 PLoS ONE e0174698 (Apr. 2017).

D.W. Woods, Legal Technology: Innovation and Its Discontents, 35 Geo. J. Legal Ethics (2022).

E. Peck, The Da Silva Moore Case Ten Years Later, eDiscovery Today (Feb. 24, 2022), https://prismlegal.com.

G. Hadfield, R. Vogl et al., LawGeex vs. Lawyers: NDA Accuracy Study, LawGeex Report (2018).

Harvard CLP, AI in Legal Business Models (2025).

J. Angwin et al., Machine Bias, ProPublica (May 2016), https://www.propublica.org.

J. Hill, JPMorgan Software Does in Seconds What Took Lawyers 360,000 Hours, Independent (Feb. 28, 2017), https://www.independent.co.uk.

L. Moran, 73% of Lawyers Plan to Use Generative AI, Legal Dive (Nov. 20, 2023), https://www.legaldive.com.

LawGeex, Comparing the Performance of AI and Human Lawyers (2018), https://artificiallawyer.com.

LawSites, AI Efficiency Study (Mar. 2025).

Legal Dive, Nearly 70% of Law Firm Professionals Use Legal Analytics (Feb. 7, 2024), https://www.legaldive.com.

Lex Machina, Legal Analytics Platform Overview (2024), https://lexmachina.com.

PRI

MIT, The New Role of AI in Legal Practice (2024).

N. Klein, From Code to Courtroom, MIT Tech. Rev. (2023).

OECD, Principles on Artificial Intelligence (2019), https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449.

Prism Legal, How AI Tools Are Changing Due Diligence (2023).

R. Friedmann, AI Beats Lawyers in NDA Review Accuracy – LawGeex Study, Prism Legal Blog (Feb. 26, 2018), https://www.prismlegal.com.

R. Susskind, Online Courts and the Future of Justice (Oxford Univ. Press 2019).

R. W. Bohannon, The Ethics of Predictive Legal Algorithms, 24 Yale J.L. & Tech. (2022).

Reuters, AI-Enhanced Lawyering: New Risks and Rewards (2024).

Reuters, Legal AI Race Draws More Investors (Apr. 26, 2023), https://www.reuters.com.

S. Merken, Lawyers Using AI Must Heed Ethics Rules, Reuters (July 29, 2024), https://www.reuters.com.

SSRN, Legal AI Performance Benchmarks (2025).

Stanford HAI & RegLab, AI on Trial: Legal Models Hallucinate in 1 out of 6 Benchmarking Queries, Stanford HAI Blog (May 23, 2024), https://hai.stanford.edu.

Stanford Law School, Case Study on Harvey AI (2024).

U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., Artificial Intelligence in Immigration Adjudication (2021).

V. Magesh et al., Hallucination-Free? Assessing the Reliability of Leading AI Legal Research Tools, J. Empirical Legal Stud. (2025).

Wolters Kluwer, 2023 Legal AI Survey (2023).

Yale Law School, Predictive Analytics in Law (2023).

eve.legal, Using AI to Reduce Legal Workload (2023), https://eve.legal.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-06