DESIGNING INCLUSIVE EFL ACTIVITIES FOR MULTI-LEVEL LEARNERS THROUGH DIFFERENTIATION
Abstract
This article studies how inclusive EFL activities can be designed for multi-level learners through differentiation. The article analyses mixed-ability language classes, common learner differences, and practical classroom tasks that can be adapted by readiness, support level, and product. A small-scale pedagogical analysis is used together with review of recent studies on differentiated instruction and multi-level language teaching. The expected result is a clearer model for planning activities that keep all learners active, supported, and challenged in one classroom.
References
1. Ashton, Karen. “Approaches to Teaching in the Multi-Level Language Classroom.” Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, vol. 13, no. 2, 2019, pp. 162-177. doi:10.1080/17501229.2017.1397158.
2. Ashton, Karen. “Exploring Teacher Views of Multi-Level Language Classes in New Zealand Secondary Schools.” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 69, 2018, pp. 104-118. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.10.002.
3. Gheith, Abeer G. “Using Differentiated Instruction for Developing Writing Fluency.” ERIC, 2020.
4. Huhn, Christina, and Patricia Davis-Wiley. “Multi-Level World Language Classes: Teacher Perspectives and Practical Solutions.” Dimensions, vol. 58, 2023, pp. 89-105.
5. Nketsia, Wisdom, et al. “Exploring the Perceived Knowledge of Teacher Educators and Pre-Service Teachers on the Differentiated Instruction Practices of Teacher Educators.” Frontiers in Education, vol. 9, 2024, article 1356675. doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1356675.
6. Smale-Jacobse, Annemieke E., et al. “Differentiated Instruction in Secondary Education: A Systematic Review of Research Evidence.” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 10, 2019, article 2366. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02366.
7. Tomlinson, Carol Ann, et al. “Differentiating Instruction in Response to Student Readiness, Interest, and Learning Profile in Academically Diverse Classrooms: A Review of Literature.” Journal for the Education of the Gifted, vol. 27, no. 2-3, 2003, pp. 119-145.