GOVERNANCE-CONSTRAINED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN COMPLIANCE-CRITICAL TRAFFIC SAFETY EDUCATION A REGULATION-BOUNDED INSTRUCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE FOR CERTIFIED PUBLIC SAFETY SYSTEMS
Abstract
Traffic safety education operates within legally regulated environments where instructional precision, statutory fidelity, and public trust are foundational requirements. Although artificial intelligence has demonstrated significant potential to improve educational accessibility and learner comprehension, its deployment in compliance-critical domains remains constrained by risks of hallucination, regulatory drift, and legal liability exposure. This study formalizes the Regulation-Bounded Artificial Intelligence (RBAI) Model, a governance-constrained instructional architecture designed for integration within state-certified traffic safety education systems. Developed during an active regulatory certification process in California (2024–2025), the RBAI Model embeds regulatory authority directly into system architecture through retrieval constraints, structured governance validation, and full audit traceability. Comparative compliance analysis demonstrates that governance-bounded AI architectures significantly reduce instructional variance and eliminate hallucination pathways relative to open generative systems. The findings establish a replicable governance framework for responsible AI deployment in public safety education and other compliance-sensitive domains.
References
California Department of Motor Vehicles. (2023). Traffic violator school program guidelines. State of California.
European Parliament. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union.
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32024R1689
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
https://curriculumredesign.org/wp-content/uploads/AI-in-Education-Promises-and-Implications.pdf
Ji, Z., Lee, N., Frieske, R., Yu, T., Su, D., Xu, Y., Ishii, E., Bang, Y., Madotto, A., & Fung, P. (2023). Survey of hallucination in natural language generation. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(12), 1–38.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3571730
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2023). Traffic safety facts: 2023 annual report. U.S. Department of Transportation.
https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/813743
National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). U.S. Department of Commerce.