MODERN MICROBIOLOGY EDUCATION IN VIROLOGY: DEVELOPING STUDENTS' DISEASE ANALYSIS AND LABORATORY DIAGNOSTIC SKILLS
Abstract
This article examines the relevance, methods, and effectiveness of developing students' practical analytical and laboratory diagnostic skills in the field of microbiology, particularly virology, within the framework of modern higher education. The primary goal of the article is to explore integrated educational models that combine theoretical knowledge with practical laboratory processes and clinical simulations to prepare students for real-world epidemiological situations involving viral infections. The study is based on an analysis of modern pedagogical approaches, including problem-based learning (PBL), case study methods, and the use of virtual and real laboratory complexes. The results indicate that the integration of digital simulation platforms with hands-on laboratory work significantly enhances the competencies of future virologists in pathogen identification, molecular diagnostics, epidemiological analysis, and decision-making. The conclusions emphasize the necessity of modernizing educational programs in biomedical specialties to meet the challenges of emerging and re-emerging viral infections, with recommendations for incorporating advanced technologies and interdisciplinary approaches into the curriculum.
References
1. AlHasan, M., & AlQahtani, D. (2021). Simulation-based training in laboratory medicine: A meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), Article 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02654-3
2. Burrell, C. J., Howard, C. R., & Murphy, F. A. (2017). Fenner and White's medical virology (5th ed.). Academic Press.
3. Detmer, A., & Nübiling, M. (2018). Implementation of a case-based virology course improves diagnostic reasoning in medical students. Journal of Medical Virology, 90(5), 785–790. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25012
4. Frey, B., Bücken, A., & Simmen, H. P. (2020). Bridging the gap: Integrating practical skills into university microbiology curricula. Journal of Biomedical Education, 2020, 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8870694
5. Gavier-Widén, D., Meredith, A., & Duff, P. (2020). Teaching high-consequence pathogen biology: Challenges and solutions. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science, 18(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1089/bsp.2019.0056
6. Makarova, E., Petrov, A., & Smirnov, K. (2021). The efficacy of blended learning in virology: Virtual pre-lab training enhances physical lab performance. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09873-1
7. Miller, J. M., Binnicker, M. J., Campbell, S., Carroll, K. C., Chapin, K. C., Gilligan, P. H., Gonzalez, M. D., Jerris, R. C., Kehl, S. C., Patel, R., Pritt, B. S., Richter, S. S., Robinson-Dunn, B., Schwartzman, J. D., Snyder, J. W., Telford, S., Theel, E. S., Thomson, R. B., Weinstein, M. P., & Yao, J. D. (2018). A guide to utilization of the microbiology laboratory for diagnosis of infectious diseases: 2018 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 67(6), e1–e94. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy381
8. Orenstein, W. A., Hinman, A. R., & Schuchat, A. (2022). The role of hands-on experience in microbial science education. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 35(2), e00110-21. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00110-21
9. Peeling, R. W., & McNerney, R. (2014). Emerging technologies in point-of-care molecular diagnostics for resource-limited settings. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, 14(5), 525–534. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737159.2014.915748
10. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
11. Safdar, N., Abbo, L. M., Knobloch, M. J., & Seo, S. K. (2020). Competency-based medical education in clinical microbiology and infectious diseases: A roadmap for the future. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 71(2), 398–404. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz874
12. Schmidt, H. G., Rotgans, J. I., & Yew, E. H. J. (2019). The process of problem-based learning: What works and why. Medical Education, 45(8), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04035.x
13. UNESCO. (2021). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374802
14. World Health Organization. (2022). Global genomic surveillance strategy for pathogens with pandemic and epidemic potential, 2022–2032. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240046979
15. Zwart, H., & de Regt, H. (2020). Philosophy of microbiology. Cambridge University Press.
16. Nasullayev, F. O. (2024). YOUNG IN CHILDREN ALLERGIC FACTORS TO THE SURFACE EXIT FACTORS. Science and innovation, 3(Special Issue 54), 372-374.
17. Norkulovich, T. V., & Otabekovich, N. F. (2024). NEW METHODS IN MEDICAL EDUCATION. TANQIDIY NAZAR, TAHLILIY TAFAKKUR VA INNOVATSION G ‘OYALAR, 1(1), 237-239.
18. Turdiyev Shukhrat Berdiyevich,Aslanov Gulom Aslanovich,Nasullayev Fayzi Otabek o`g`li, & Turdiyev Shukhrat Berdiyevich,Mirjanova Madina Mirjanovna,Nasullayev Fayzi Otabekovich. (2025). INSON VA KOMPYUTER O`ZARO TA’SIRINI FAN VA TA`LIMDA QO`LLASH. Журнал научных исследований и их решений, 4(02), 63–71. извлечено от https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/ituy/article/view/82675
