GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX OF THE DISEASE EDUCATION FIELD REPRESENTATIVES BETWEEN MANY MEETING REASONS AND RIGHT PREVENTION MEASURES WORKING EXIT
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) – stomach of the composition to the red one pathological return as a result developing , in the world the most wide widespread gastroenterological from diseases is one . The last in years of the disease education field representatives – teachers , professors , students and students between sharp growth epidemiological importance profession This is of the research purpose , education in the field in individuals GERD high incidence professional and psychosocial the reasons to clarify , as well as this to the problem aimed at special prevention program working is an exit .
References
1. Vakil N., van Zanten S.V., Kahrilas P., et al. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006. Vol. 101. P. 1900-1920.
2. Dent J., El-Serag H.B., Wallander M.A., Johansson S. Epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut. 2005. Vol. 54(5). P. 710-717.
3. El-Serag H.B., Sweet S., Winchester C.C., et al. Update on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut. 2014. Vol. 63(6). P. 871-880.
4. Roy N., Merrill R.M., Thibeault S., et al. Prevalence of voice disorders in teachers and the general population. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004. Vol. 47(2). P. 281-293.
5. Navoi SK, Yusupov AR Physiological processes and voice activity . Tashkent : Science , 2020. 145 p.
6. Hamraev AA, Safarov AK Uzbekistan in the population high food digestion to do way diseases epidemiology . Tashkent medicine Journal . 2021. No. 4. P. 32-36.
7. Brown R.P., Gerbarg P.L. The healing power of the breath: simple techniques to reduce stress and anxiety, enhance concentration, and balance your emotions. Shambhala Publications, 2019. 208 p.
8. Gyawali C.P., Kahrilas P.J., Savarino E., et al. Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus. Gut. 2018. Vol. 67(7). P. 1351-1362.
9. Katz P.O., Gerson L.B., Vela M.F. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013. Vol. 108. P. 308-328.
10. Short VG, Lapina TL Professional Features GERD technologies in teachers . Clinical medicsina . 2018. No. 96(3). P. 256-260.
11. Khudoyberdiyeva HA, Safarov AK Students at the age of in individuals gastroesophageal reflux of the disease psychosomatic Aspects . Age scientists scientific and practical conference materials . Navoi , 2023. P. 45-48.
12. Shaheen N.J., Falk G.W., Iyer P.G., Gerson L.B. ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Barrett’s Esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016. Vol. 111(1). P. 30-50.
13. Sontag S.J. The medical management of reflux esophagitis. Role of antacids and acid inhibition. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1990. Vol. 19(3). P. 683-712.
14. Tytgat G.N., McColl K., Tack J., et al. New algorithm for the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008. Vol. 27(3). P. 249-256.
15. Zagari R.M., Fuccio L., Wallander M.A., et al. Gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms, oesophagitis and Barrett’s oesophagus in the general population: the Loiano-Monghidoro study. Gut. 2008. Vol. 57(10). P. 1354-1359.
